Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 09:03
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 201
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 440
51% 397 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11E6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 14.2
13% 13 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 15.7
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 256GB PRO
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220719b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1462 410 213 260 259 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,134
Write 1,252
Mixed 900
SusWrite 480
211% 941 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 48.1
155% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 582
448% 617 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 151%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 22.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $560
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback