Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemGigabyte B150M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 05:08
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$68
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 46.1
23% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 70.9
8-Core 93.7
10% 82.3 Pts
64-Core 86.7
5% 86.7 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.1
17% 19.7 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 2.2 186 96 71 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 330
Write 230
Mixed 215
SusWrite 103
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 6
30% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 44.8
48% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
741GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 171 171 173 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 179
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 169
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
199GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 69 70 70 70 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 67.4
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 66.5
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS722080K9SA00 80GB
52GB free
Firmware: DCBOC79A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 52.4
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 47.9
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 216
18% 216 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 335 126 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5A2D 22MB35
Typical GA-B150M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback