Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory33.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime18.7 Days
Run DateMar 05 '24 at 13:23
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 192
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 597
60% 489 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 10.2
10% 12.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.4
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 353
Mixed 185
72% 327 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 36.8
101% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 224
184% 260 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 87%
SK hynix SC215 M.2 2242 32GB
23GB free
Firmware: 50001L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 407
Write 80.9
Mixed 126
SusWrite 79.4
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 18.8
95% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 112
88% 125 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.3% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 20
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 DELD0A1 SE2717H/HX
Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback