Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 05 '24 at 08:02
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 166
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 321
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 39.1
35% 41 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 27.5
28% 35.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 220 231 234 234 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.5% Good
Read 218
Write 230
Mixed 222
SusWrite 220
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 37.6
122% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 123
114% 176 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
111GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 53 53 55 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 28.1
Mixed 41
SusWrite 53.3
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
209GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 144 143 145 145 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 107
Mixed 80
SusWrite 142
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 112%
JMicron Tech 512GB
477GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
Read 33.6
Write 40.4
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 39.8
53% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 13
918% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 20.6
DQ Mixed 15.6
1,282% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F21 BenQ xl2420t
Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3P Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback