Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '24 at 14:44
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$99 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 89.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 233 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 728 71% 580 Pts	64-Core 904 56% 904 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.61 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 73.1 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 68.8 60% 72.4 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 71 Splatting 66.5 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 142 121 114 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 307 Write 200 Mixed 240 SusWrite 127 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 31.1 114% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 179 133% 173 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 84%
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 204GB free Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 256 254 255 254 255 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 451 Write 341 Mixed 223 SusWrite 262 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 33.2 115% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 210 178% 261 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 94%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 670GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 53 53 58 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25% Poor	Read 35 Write 39.8 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 51.7 34% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 392GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 149 149 149 150 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 150 Write 125 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 148 91% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 112%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 260GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 132 134 134 134 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 161 Write 36.7 Mixed 79 SusWrite 130 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 77%
Sony Storage Media 64GB 320 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 50GB free, PID 09c2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 22 19 20 21 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 104 Write 52.5 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 18.3 54% 49 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 42% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 26%
WD Elements SE 2623 1TB 747 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 475GB free, PID 2623 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 117 Write 104 Mixed 68.4 SusWrite 91.9 126% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.4 159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.9% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 21.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 22.9 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	144	27"	1280 720	SAM0FDB C27JG5x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B460-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460-PLUS - $140

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	851x
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	298x
Core i5-10600KIntel $144Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	238x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	255x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	210x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	199x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	61x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	56x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	151x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	136x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $631

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16