Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Blade Pro
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 512
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6750) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.6% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 137
Parallax 119
93% 124 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 120
Splatting 113
94% 115 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$130
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1137 1366 1523 1677 1517 1589 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,849
Write 1,828
Mixed 1,127
SusWrite 1,468
352% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.5
209% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 783
599% 821 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 265%
Great: 370%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
461GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1547 1048 618 621 620 618 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,654
Write 1,430
Mixed 616
SusWrite 845
253% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 55.2
201% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 985
DQ Mixed 820
679% 977 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 226%
Great: 254%
Sage 3639S 1TB
557GB free
Firmware: 0056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 338 358 379 368 373 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 76%
Sony Storage Media 64GB
23GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 38 38 38 38 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 103
Write 52
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 34.3
55% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
99% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback