Intel B75

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel B75 (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '24 at 13:22
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 48.6 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 175 56% 104 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 183 36% 248 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 098E) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.5% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 0.9 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 1.8 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.5% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 128 72 60 80 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37% Below average	Read 187 Write 144 Mixed 160 SusWrite 95.2 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 14.4 56% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 127 100% 140 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 91%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 159GB free Firmware: S3H01103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 200 224 221 215 220 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 192 Write 159 Mixed 175 SusWrite 208 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 12.1 49% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 99.8 86% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-039.A00LF 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	40.8% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 10 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 163 25% 163 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	53	60	27.6"	1536 801	SAM0B54 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75 Builds (Compare 4,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel B75

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,014x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	744x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	712x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	437x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	412x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	386x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	149x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	89x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	62x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	555x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	217x
HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 2,722 samples	140x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16