Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '24 at 06:50
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 142
2-Core 279
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1,085
97% 818 Pts
64-Core 2,083
129% 2,083 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 277
Reflection 230
Parallax 298
226% 268 fps
MRender 294
Gravity 221
Splatting 162
178% 226 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,801
Write 1,622
Mixed 638
299% 1,354 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 54.5
190% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,187
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 945
757% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
429GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 359 416 435 433 433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 434
Mixed 445
SusWrite 401
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 46.2
154% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 100%
Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
50GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 156 101 94 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 224
Write 353
Mixed 304
SusWrite 128
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 24.8
101% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 128
105% 152 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 88%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146
248GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 410 402 402 400 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 412
Mixed 392
SusWrite 403
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 41.9
135% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 179
139% 192 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 125%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
154GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,886
Write 3,198
Mixed 2,123
542% 2,403 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 69.3
228% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,495
DQ Write 1203
DQ Mixed 1,302
988% 1,333 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 40.5
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 34.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 57 240 26.9" 1280 720 MSI3CA8 MSI MAG274QRX
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,743
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback