Ibuypower INTEL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 299%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 396%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 129%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics241% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive489% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIbuypower INTEL  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star PRO Z790-P WIFI (MS-7E06)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 1100 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231027
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateMar 03 '24 at 06:46
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 231
2-Core 470
133% 261 Pts
4-Core 939
8-Core 1,724
159% 1,331 Pts
64-Core 4,287
265% 4,287 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$780
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
241% Outstanding
Lighting 348
Reflection 360
Parallax 421
284% 377 fps
MRender 472
Gravity 296
Splatting 230
260% 333 fps
Poor: 233%
This bench: 241%
Great: 265%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3251 3298 3247 3173 3158 3143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
489% Outstanding
Read 2,716
Write 3,077
Mixed 2,826
SusWrite 3,212
669% 2,958 MB/s
4K Read 77.3
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 115
382% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,645
DQ Write 1,299
DQ Mixed 1,459
1,095% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 489%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 77.7
MC Write 65.4
MC Mixed 69
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 31.5
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 179%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical INTEL Builds (Compare 7,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

System: Ibuypower INTEL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,068
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback