Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 2 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '24 at 17:52
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 193 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 381 44% 344 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Asus(1043 04F5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.9% Below average	Lighting 49 Reflection 43.7 Parallax 63.6 40% 52.1 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 33.8 34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 203 215 206 203 180 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 437 Write 262 Mixed 159 SusWrite 200 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 35.1 131% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 168 162% 259 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 463GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 123 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 0.7 35% 47.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 19.5 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 17.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	28	9	60	27"	1920 1017	SAM0D32 C27F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	184x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	94x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	76x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	59x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	41x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16