Asus H81-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '23 at 19:41
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 192
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 320
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
Asus(1043 04F5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.8% Below average
Lighting 48.4
Reflection 47.4
Parallax 62.8
39% 52.9 fps
MRender 46
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 33.6
34% 43.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,909
Write 2,576
Mixed 2,549
597% 2678 MB/s
4K Read 199
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 121
513% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 473
366% 504 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
543GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 176 174 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 178
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 174
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81-GAMER Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback