Biostar H410MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar H410MH  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 05:47
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 625
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 267
Parallax 299
0% 189 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 240
Splatting 0.1
142% 200 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 120 37 58 59 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 414
Write 440
Mixed 226
SusWrite 84.8
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 37.2
146% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 181
153% 229 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 107%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
433GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 497 497 497 496 493 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,338
Write 1,228
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 574
236% 1,052 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 67.6
223% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 428
414% 660 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 193%
Great: 311%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 200 201 199 201 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 161
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 199
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BAPC08G2666D4S8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 15.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 1G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 29% 35 215 57 100 33.9" 3440 1417 ACR0648 ED347CKR
Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 1,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback