HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 00:44
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 140
54% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 277
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6SB1M064G1022I 250GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 112 83 62 109 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 333
Write 294
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 92.2
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 18.6
38% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 0.8
55% 132 MB/s
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$45
861GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 131 132 131 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 94.8
Write 123
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 130
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x] 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 24 0" 1280 720
Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 2,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback