HP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8062
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 00:37
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 596
63% 505 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
EVGA(3842 6278) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 114
Parallax 106
94% 112 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 106
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U-512G-1006 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4130106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 277 280 292 291 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 380
Write 296
Mixed 254
SusWrite 274
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 40.5
128% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 222
184% 267 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x0285] 3000 C16 Series 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.1
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 24" 1280 720 AUS24C2 VG248
Typical ProDesk 400 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback