Gigabyte GA-Z790 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics249% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 22:52
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 75.4
1-Core 207
2-Core 418
119% 233 Pts
4-Core 845
8-Core 1,511
142% 1,178 Pts
64-Core 2,304
143% 2,304 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
PNY(196E 13B5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
249% Outstanding
Lighting 363
Reflection 352
Parallax 414
296% 376 fps
MRender 504
Gravity 305
Splatting 221
267% 344 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 249%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,738
Write 2,076
Mixed 1,758
416% 1,857 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 97.5
336% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,578
DQ Write 1,212
DQ Mixed 1,218
959% 1,336 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Transcend SSD320 64GB-$128
3GB free
Firmware: 5.0.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 194
Write 67
Mixed 96
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 31.4
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 81.7
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 70
54% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 48%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
52GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 510
Write 421
Mixed 262
88% 398 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 30.2
118% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 280
226% 320 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 117%
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
25GB free
Firmware: M2CR010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 514
Write 439
Mixed 376
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 35.9
127% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 234
193% 274 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
188GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.3
Write 35.3
Mixed 44
39% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.8
Write 8.5
Mixed 10.2
17% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.3
Write 38.6
Mixed 28.2
47% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 63.4
MC Write 62.1
MC Mixed 56.8
174% 60.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 26.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 155%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM7454 Odyssey G93SC
Typical GA-Z790 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 3,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback