PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte H110M-M.2 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-M2-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180411 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 01 '24 at 16:38 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI190000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 57 56 58 62 67 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
232GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 369 443 294 288 293 MB/s
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62
30GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 345 373 370 370 365 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown SP008GBLFU240B02 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 62 | 44 | 60 | 24.1" | 1280 720 | DELF016 DELL U2410 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 120x |
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 43x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 42x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 42x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 41x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |