TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Micro Venus Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive560% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro Venus Series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen AHWSA
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '24 at 18:53
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 187
2-Core 376
109% 212 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,150
116% 944 Pts
64-Core 1,762
109% 1,762 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000
Dell(1028 151D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 5.5GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Lighting 89
Reflection 96.6
Parallax 88.9
72% 91.5 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 80.2
70% 86.7 fps
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 71.7%
 Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4382 4524 4528 4609 4604 1365 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
560% Outstanding
Read 3,177
Write 4,663
Mixed 3,372
SusWrite 4002
863% 3,803 MB/s
4K Read 89.6
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 130
422% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 1,458
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 1,326
980% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 299% ↑
This bench: 560%
 Great: 592%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
615GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1414 1428 1428 1427 290 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,093
Write 1,398
Mixed 1189
SusWrite 1,012
265% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 78.4
287% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,109
DQ Write 1,222
DQ Mixed 1,313
947% 1,215 MB/s
Poor: 129% ↑
This bench: 246%
 Great: 307%
Samsung SSD 870 EVO 1TB
108GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 242 241 239 225 230 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
171% Outstanding
Read 238
Write 226
Mixed 228
SusWrite 237
317% 232 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 24.8
1,813% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 27.8
DQ Mixed 26.7
1,950% 26.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G56C46S5.C16D 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 32.8
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 93.3%
 Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 30 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0B81 U28D590
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Venus Series Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Micro Venus Series

CPU
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples46x
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples18x
Core i5-13500HIntelBench 100%, 1,437 samples15x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples60x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples22x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 13%, 6,572 samples12x
SSD
OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TBKingstonBench 327%, 379 samples54x
OM8PGP4512Q-A0 512GBKingstonBench 318%, 337 samples28x
SSD 512GBVickterBench 182%, 21 samples7x
RAM
CBD48S40BS8MA-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 125%, 310 samples33x
CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GBCrucialBench 133%, 4,167 samples16x
CT16G56C46S5.M8G1 2x16GBCrucialBench 139%, 2,142 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback