Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '24 at 02:29
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 639
69% 546 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 195
Reflection 176
Parallax 168
159% 180 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 140
Splatting 118
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 215 258 272 270 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 479
Mixed 446
SusWrite 237
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 60.6
202% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 314
237% 316 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
829GB free
Firmware: P9CR311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 607 699 705 702 704 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 653
Write 717
Mixed 680
SusWrite 626
151% 669 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 83.5
278% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 964
666% 822 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 184%
Great: 394%
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
2TB free
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 197 155 135 133 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 442
Write 392
Mixed 307
SusWrite 148
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 15.5
77% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 33
47% 88 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
328GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 103 104 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 90.7
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 102
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
358GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 136 136 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 160
Write 102
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 133
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 18.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 23.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 75 27" 1280 720 AUS27AE ASUS VP278
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback