HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2293
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '24 at 05:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 75.1
38% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 94.5
8-Core 97.5
13% 96 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2293) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AT421 240GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.18.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 236 297 260 208 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 415
Write 332
Mixed 312
SusWrite 263
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 13.8
73% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 30.8
52% 100 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston HP691160-H65-MCN 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 16 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO42EC
Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback