MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive375% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E26
MotherboardMSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '24 at 22:26
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 202
2-Core 401
119% 229 Pts
4-Core 761
8-Core 1,389
129% 1,075 Pts
64-Core 1,948
121% 1,948 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 198
75% 127 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 107
92% 115 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SCK00105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2893 2877 2892 2907 1752 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2,102
Write 2,769
Mixed 2,194
SusWrite 2,270
528% 2,334 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 265
4K Mixed 77.3
315% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 1,371
DQ Mixed 1,022
843% 1,199 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 375%
Great: 352%
WDC WD60 EFAX-68JH4N0 6TB
35GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 148 148 145 149 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 162
Write 140
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 147
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 0.7
30% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 31%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 257 257 256 256 254 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
153% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 60.1
MC Mixed 54.9
157% 55 GB/s
SC Read 45.4
SC Write 61.8
SC Mixed 51.8
151% 53 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 153%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26) Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $1,019
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback