TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive461% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Discovery_RTX
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '24 at 14:55
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 63.7
1-Core 206
2-Core 415
115% 228 Pts
4-Core 808
8-Core 1,466
136% 1,137 Pts
64-Core 3,127
194% 3,127 Pts
Poor: 108% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 166C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3425
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.7
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 10.4
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 8.34%
 Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4007 4003 2191 1313 1228 1247 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 3,580
Write 3,890
Mixed 2,623
SusWrite 2,331
698% 3,106 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 92.7
336% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,834
DQ Write 1,432
DQ Mixed 1,595
1,204% 1,620 MB/s
Poor: 196% ↑
This bench: 461%
 Great: 540%
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIe SSD 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: H230703a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4062 3997 3973 4043 1770 1137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
570% Outstanding
Read 3990
Write 4,473
Mixed 3278
SusWrite 3,164
840% 3,726 MB/s
4K Read 79.6
4K Write 292
4K Mixed 121
430% 164 MB/s
DQ Read 2,222
DQ Write 1,578
DQ Mixed 1,494
1,226% 1,765 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑
This bench: 570%
 Great: 570%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G52C42S5.M8G1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 50.1
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 17.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 113% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 163%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 16" 1280 720 CMN162F
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator PH16-71 Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 256%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PH16-71

CPU
Core i9-13900HXIntelBench 115%, 8,895 samples305x
Core i7-13700HXIntelBench 108%, 3,030 samples100x
GPU
RTX 4080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 188%, 4,213 samples163x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 8%, 10,524 samples110x
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples67x
SSD
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBNvmeBench 407%, 6,767 samples292x
SAMSUNG MZVL22T0HBLB-00B07 2TBNvmeBench 389%, 102 samples44x
Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TBNvmeBench 404%, 3,576 samples11x
RAM
HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GBHynixBench 152%, 5,144 samples115x
HMCG66AGBSA095N 2x8GBHynixBench 129%, 2,777 samples75x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples36x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback