Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	17.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 2 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230224
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '24 at 13:35
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$110 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 171 2-Core 334 107% 199 Pts	4-Core 640 8-Core 957 99% 799 Pts	64-Core 1,204 74% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 397D) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.7% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 117 Parallax 133 104% 126 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 102 Splatting 89.5 88% 110 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB 31,107 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 307GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R6305 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 99 83 93 92 4.7 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.6% Very poor	Read 104 Write 7.7 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 70 14% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 2.3 26% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 48.4 DQ Mixed 2 12% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 99%
Netac 960GB 960GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 483GB free Firmware: U0503A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 435 435 435 436 437 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 443 Mixed 412 SusWrite 437 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 32.2 143% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 48 96% 189 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB 24,428 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.1% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 22 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.1 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 24.6 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	165	23.8"	1920 1017	VSC623B VX2418-P FHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	44x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	38x
Ryzen 7 5700GAMD $138Bench 88%, 17,091 samples	23x

GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	37x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	25x
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	15x

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	20x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	7x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	6x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	24x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	12x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16