Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 10:32
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6402P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 366
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8562) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 42.9
33% 42.2 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 34.1
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 256GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 384
Write 345
Mixed 317
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.9
39% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 85
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 1
14% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.6
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 64%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $542
The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback