Zoostorm 9876-1870A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZoostorm 9876-1870A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-K
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '24 at 09:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 197
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 548
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 19.5
16% 18.8 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 15.8
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 250GB 250GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 367 381 401 398 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 454
Write 388
Mixed 370
SusWrite 383
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 26.5
120% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 43
95% 192 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 88%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
349GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 127 148 163 163 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 161
Write 159
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 151
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 50 60 23.8" 1280 720 SAM710B F24G3xTF
Typical 9876-1870A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 9876-1870A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $505
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback