Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 235%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 296%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive469% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory35.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime3 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '24 at 16:56
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700KF-$376
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 228
2-Core 458
133% 258 Pts
4-Core 919
8-Core 1,744
158% 1,332 Pts
64-Core 3,801
235% 3,801 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
185% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 259
Parallax 279
209% 265 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 236
Splatting 185
202% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 185%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3381 2035 1686 1700 1729 1717 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 3,128
Write 3528
Mixed 3,178
SusWrite 2,041
669% 2,969 MB/s
4K Read 90.2
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 129
432% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 2,154
DQ Write 1,662
DQ Mixed 1,891
1,419% 1,902 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 469%
Great: 477%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 165 176 177 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 128
Write 155
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 171
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate One Touch w/PW 4TB
95GB free
Firmware: 1708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 59 60 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 84
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 62.9
47% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
143% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 69%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 4TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 74 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 63.3
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 74
84% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
552GB free, PID 0825
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 74 73 73 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 130
Write 150
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 75.5
121% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F322x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
194% Outstanding
MC Read 80.2
MC Write 74.9
MC Mixed 74
218% 76.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 51.4
SC Mixed 36.3
108% 37.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 194%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2701 PA278QV
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 240%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $1,064
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback