Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '24 at 09:15
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 45
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 179
56% 105 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 331
46% 339 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.9% Above average
Lighting 74.5
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 71.9
61% 73.4 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 58.6
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 1TB
665GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1344 982 920 1208 1087 785 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 2046
Mixed 1,703
SusWrite 1,054
379% 1,686 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 56.3
184% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 637
478% 646 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 228%
Great: 335%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
638GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 181 182 183 180 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 178
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 180
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB
313GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 8 10 32 33 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 100
Write 11.5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 20.5
34% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 45%
External USB3.0 DISK00 4TB
53GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 79 78 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 92
Write 96.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 79.3
107% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 77%
External USB3.0 DISK01 14TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 176 181 178 176 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 150
Write 173
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 178
194% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 111%
External USB3.0 DISK02 3TB
16GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 79 78 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 73.6
Write 56
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 79.2
88% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX426C16FB2/16 78.CAGPP.ARW0C 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.8% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 2R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 4 165 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0734 XV240Y P
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback