Asus PRIME Z270-AR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-AR  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '24 at 17:26
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 177
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 272
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.37 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4 256GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APB05PI0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 1,054
Mixed 126
103% 449 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 47.8
138% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 577
396% 491 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 243%
Crucial MTFDDAK2T0TDL-1AW1ZABHA 2TB
505GB free
Firmware: HPC0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 347 410 377 405 411 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 389
Write 400
Mixed 358
SusWrite 386
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 41.6
139% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 349
261% 346 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FBD2 Kingston KHX2933C17D4/8G 12GB
2933, 2933 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 27" 1920 1017 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical PRIME Z270-AR Builds (Compare 1,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-AR - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback