PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180917 |
Uptime | 4.4 Days |
Run Date | Feb 24 '24 at 17:11 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
83.5%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Plextor PX-256M9PeGN 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 142 124 146 145 132 MB/s
|
134%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
148GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1153 454 356 423 428 417 MB/s
|
180%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$30
882GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 150 152 151 150 MB/s
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 53 | 21 | 75 | 24" | 1920 1017 | AOC246A 2460G5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 482x |
Core i5-8400Intel $120Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 350x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 268x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 166x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 162x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 152x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $476 |