Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive349% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P  (all builds)
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '24 at 15:06
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 284
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 984
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 36.9
29% 37.3 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 26.5
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1509 2024 2129 2152 2160 2158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,344
Write 2,196
Mixed 2,162
SusWrite 2,022
491% 2,181 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 76
250% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 1,223
916% 1,226 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 349%
Great: 515%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
686GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 482 482 481 482 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 479
Mixed 439
SusWrite 480
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 52.8
177% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 121%
Great: 128%
Generic External 500GB
1GB free, PID 1240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.4
Write 38.7
Mixed 17.4
41% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 11.1
479% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 76%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 1TB
476GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 38.2
Write 39.1
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 38.3
53% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 18
1,169% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 19.9
1,503% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $94

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback