Asus BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF
Memory13.7 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 11:08
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670T
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 161
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 284
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.7% Good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 89.9
Parallax 78.2
75% 86.6 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 72.8
60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 134
Mixed 103
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 2.7
64% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 30.4
51% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
54GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 20
Mixed 9.7
22% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.5
138% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 4 60 18.3" 1280 720 SAM0294 SyncMaster
Typical BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM1AF_BP1AF_BM6AF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback