Acer DG-C-N50-110

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer DG-C-N50-110  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-110
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 21:09
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 894
86% 711 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Sapphire(174B A538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3625 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.6% Good
Lighting 86.3
Reflection 83.8
Parallax 80
70% 83.4 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 68.6
65% 81.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 716 717 745 596 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,210
Write 1359
Mixed 1,077
SusWrite 689
244% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 61.1
195% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 852
636% 846 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 189%
Great: 213%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
921GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 508 438 578 507 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43DB2-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 33.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 0P 5R 9G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 16% 112 176 5 165 27" 1280 720 ACR0784 RG271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback