Acer DG-C-N50-110

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer DG-C-N50-110  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-110
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 20:54
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 251
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 896
85% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Sapphire(174B A538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67% Good
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 82.4
Parallax 85.7
68% 83.8 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 68.6
65% 81.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 905 699 670 528 510 488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1205
Write 1,234
Mixed 1,058
SusWrite 633
232% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 61.1
219% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 755
DQ Mixed 837
625% 833 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 191%
Great: 213%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
921GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 479 536 508 405 611 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43DB2-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 32.5
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 69: 0P 5R 10G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
69% 22% 129 477 374 165 27" 1280 720 ACR0784 RG271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback