Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 19:40
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 160
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 522
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 27.6
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 14.8
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 333
Mixed 357
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1.1
44% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 21.1
30% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
937GB free
Firmware: 1405
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.3
Write 88
Mixed 71.5
62% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 93%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
57GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.8
Write 18
Mixed 22
28% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.3
125% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 12 240 27" 1920 1017 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback