Lenovo 82XN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82XN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230614
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 16:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 209
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 424
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Legend(17AA 3C39) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.45
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 11.1
5% 9.53 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ4X112N 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 480 384 414 339 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 587
Write 519
Mixed 479
SusWrite 394
111% 495 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 26.1
109% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 363
261% 347 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 18
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 39 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN9021
Typical 82XN Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82XN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback