Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_DT1234567890
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 10:54
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 166
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 330
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 62
52% 63.9 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 60
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 206 37 90 62 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 250
Write 229
Mixed 197
SusWrite 107
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 23.2
91% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 132
113% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 87%
Kingston SA400S37120GB 120GB
46GB free
Firmware: HPS1A30F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 120 112 123 123 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 249
Write 130
Mixed 158
SusWrite 102
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 9.6
80% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 12.4
41% 90.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
67GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 99 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64% Good
Read 122
Write 40.9
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 101
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64%
Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
246GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 830B NT8GC64B8HB0NF-DI M378B5273EB0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 0" 1280 720 TS35505
Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback