Lenovo 81NC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81NC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 03:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 155
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 486
45% 374 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 20.6
11% 13.7 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 10.2
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 86 92 104 103 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 444
Write 264
Mixed 223
SusWrite 95.4
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 16.9
89% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 92.6
144% 274 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
481GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 106 105 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 70.1
Write 104
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 103
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 9 60 15.5" 1536 841 CMN15F5
Typical 81NC Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback