Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '24 at 23:50
Run Duration58 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 284
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 654
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,964
Write 1,247
Mixed 63.2
237% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 30.2
146% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 19.8
DQ Mixed 56
80% 160 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 14.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 11% 27 76 11 75 0" 1920 1009
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC Builds (Compare 4,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback