Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230805
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '24 at 13:15
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 13.4
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 143
32% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 331
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4972
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6.8
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jumper 512G 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14357
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 307 302 308 277 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 306
Write 289
Mixed 300
SusWrite 294
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 13.9
48% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 247
180% 231 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (81st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.2% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 11.3
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 452
9% 452 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 10 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0A34
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback