Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 2 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GD
Memory	0.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '24 at 13:14
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 129 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 366 36% 294 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 13B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.05% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 7 Parallax 5.6 4% 6.03 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 8.8 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.05% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1006 787 788 787 789 790 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 1,408 Write 1766 Mixed 890 SusWrite 824 275% 1,222 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 58.2 190% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 662 DQ Write 524 DQ Mixed 589 442% 592 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 340%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 40GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 72 71 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 44 Write 73.1 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 69.4 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.4 123% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04CB 16GB 1,043 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.9% Good	MC Read 29 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 18.3 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 20.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	23	60	15.5"	1280 720	NCP002D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD Builds (Compare 747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	470x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	277x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	417x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	330x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	63x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	61x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	60x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	219x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	99x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16