PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 18 '24 at 14:09 |
Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.6%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intenso SSD 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1103A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 201 201 205 208 204 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36% | 26% | 31 | 21 | 0 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | AOC2702 27G2G5 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 65x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 58x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 46x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |