Oegstone H110M-A/DP

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Oegstone H110M-A/DP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H110M-A/DP
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20160201
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '24 at 13:09
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 181 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 548 54% 440 Pts	64-Core 564 35% 564 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 881D) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 118 Parallax 123 107% 124 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 102 Splatting 88.3 87% 110 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 250GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11628 SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 340 367 384 130 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 447 Write 401 Mixed 383 SusWrite 268 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 35.8 127% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 268 179% 214 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 110%
Seagate ST9750422AS 750GB-$69 803 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 137GB free Firmware: 0001BSM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 85 83 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 78.3 Write 79.5 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 83.3 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF 1x16GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 9 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
9%	18%	28	213	58	144	27"	1280 720	AOC2701 27G1G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/DP Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone H110M-A/DP

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	18x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	18x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	12x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	6x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	4x

SSD
Z400s 256GBSanDisk $221Bench 72%, 10,770 samples	7x
512G 512GBHs-ssd-e100Bench 74%, 2,522 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
9905625-062.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,218 samples	4x
ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 687 samples	4x
9905622-058.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 2,797 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16