HP Z2 SFF G5 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z2 SFF G5 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8753
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 03:50
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 952
92% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Gigabyte(1458 4116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 115
Parallax 156
135% 145 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
114% 146 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1104 1100 1101 1106 1107 1105 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,019
Write 1,950
Mixed 1,896
SusWrite 1,104
392% 1,742 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 56.8
184% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 543
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 639
502% 682 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 237%
Great: 400%
Nvme CT1000T50 1TB
433GB free
Firmware: P8CR002 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1896 1968 1988 1988 1984 1986 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,121
Write 1,859
Mixed 1,780
SusWrite 1,968
435% 1,932 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 56
183% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 567
448% 612 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 290%
Great: 583%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 27.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 30 72.3" 2560 1440 GSM8080 LG TV SSCR2
Typical Z2 SFF G5 Workstation Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Z2 SFF G5 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback