HP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F4
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 23:33
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 144
2-Core 296
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 998
93% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,287
80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 88F4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 10.7
7% 11.7 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme MTFDHBA512TDV-1AZ1AABHA 512GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0032 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2014 2063 806 486 479 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,563
Write 2,238
Mixed 1,455
SusWrite 1,055
356% 1,578 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 71.8
232% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 883
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 851
626% 823 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 235%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 29
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 18
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 16" 1280 720 CMN1602
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx Builds (Compare 2,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback