Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 19:32
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 270
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 1,090
96% 817 Pts
64-Core 1463
90% 1463 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 64.2
55% 68 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 56
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M Series NVMe SSD 256G 256GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 112 271 222 359 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,674
Write 1,157
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 232
228% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 48.9
234% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 115
238% 490 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 181%
Great: 252%
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
612GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 456 472 459 427 448 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 488
Mixed 397
SusWrite 438
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 53.2
186% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 253
216% 318 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 120%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST3000VM002-1F316N 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 162 164 165 163 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 160
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 161
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93%
Great: 100%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 162 165 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 196
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 161
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.7
261% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 100%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3300C16-4GRRD F4-3300C16-4GRRD F4-3300C16-4GRRD Corsair CMR32GX4M2D3000C16 28GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.5% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 25.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 49" 1280 720 SNYFB03 SONY TV *00
Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback