MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 15:37
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 177
2-Core 352
112% 208 Pts
4-Core 699
8-Core 1084
110% 892 Pts
64-Core 1,195
74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 113%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 192
Parallax 179
161% 190 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 131
Splatting 128
130% 165 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 140%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 456 472 474 493 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 495
Mixed 461
SusWrite 476
110% 487 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.3
212% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 356 375 367 378 379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 496
Mixed 440
SusWrite 387
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 50.9
185% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 374
282% 376 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
864GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2070 2317 1519 1489 1513 1530 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,711
Write 2,523
Mixed 2,005
SusWrite 1,740
504% 2,245 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 102
351% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1597
DQ Write 1369
DQ Mixed 1,427
1,084% 1,464 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 389%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1044 876 877 865 877 879 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,615
Write 1,534
Mixed 1,610
SusWrite 903
370% 1,665 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 98.5
328% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,581
DQ Write 1,339
DQ Mixed 1,410
1,070% 1,443 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 327%
Great: 355%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 187 192 193 197 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 193
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 193
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3866 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 52.9
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 47.5
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 36
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 47.6
107% 37.6 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 121%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 80 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7080 LC32G5xT
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback