Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160304
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '24 at 06:42
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 186 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 356 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.7% Average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 57.4 44% 58.8 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 56.2 Splatting 51.4 46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 128GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 303 370 424 380 375 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 846 Write 20.7 Mixed 351 SusWrite 360 86% 394 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 31.8 115% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 82.1 106% 190 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 53%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 32GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	3.17% Terrible	Read 49.9 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 14.6 4% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 913GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 147 161 160 161 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 145 Mixed 94.8 SusWrite 157 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%
WD Elements SE 25FE 2TB 1,305 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1TB free, PID 25fe Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 65.9 Write 84.8 Mixed 47.1 SusWrite 71.4 93% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.3 147% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB 43,162 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.9% Very good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 24 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 20.8 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	56	60	24"	1280 720	SAM0A28 S24C300

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5305 G/C184 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Medion ERAZER X5305 G/C184

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	10x

SSD
PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10CSSDBench 68%, 252 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	6x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GBMicronBench 62%, 35 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBCorsairBench 68%, 7,803 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16