Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 23:14
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 208
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 583
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,006
Write 1,554
Mixed 1117
276% 1,225 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 52.3
174% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 618
473% 647 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 20.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 208 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOAF90
Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 16,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback