Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 11:58
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$174
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 244
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 736
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 922
57% 922 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Asus(1043 8732) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 120
Parallax 117
98% 119 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.1
87% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 44 39 34 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 403
Write 82
Mixed 101
SusWrite 48.9
34% 159 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 18
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 45.4
70% 142 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
157GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 63.8
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
169GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 100 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 66.8
Write 59.6
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 102
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3600C18-8GVK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3600C18-8GVK 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 30 27.9" 1280 720 KGN0AF0 HDMI
Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback