PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Huananzhi X99-TF (all builds) |
Motherboard | HUANANZHI X99-TF |
Memory | 50.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210120 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 16 '24 at 06:10 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
69.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 4070-$539
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
189%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 117 160 232 781 825 MB/s
|
124%
Outstanding
|
|||
Q-1TB 1TB
357GB free
Firmware: VE0R840H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 364 367 372 367 364 MB/s
|
70.3%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
419GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 73 74 72 75 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
286GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 24 23 19 28 MB/s
|
6.79%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
96.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 27 | 6 | 75 | 27" | 1280 720 | PHLC23A PHL 275E2F |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples | 200x |
Xeon E5-2673 v3IntelBench 70%, 592 samples | 17x |
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 20x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 19x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |