Gigabyte GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270-Phoenix Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 00:57
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 646
63% 518 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 7
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 397 387 387 387 392 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1557
Write 1,375
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 401
244% 1,095 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 61.4
201% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 674
492% 649 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 178%
Great: 279%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
200GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 122 122 122 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 113
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 122
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
683GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 98 99 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 92
Write 95.4
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 97.3
61% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
257GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 89
Write 88.6
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 76
55% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RZX-D4D17M2400B-16G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 2R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 14% 35 90 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP322C HP P222va
Typical GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback